Legal Opinion

Leahy v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 7, 2008No. 03072960M; A125687PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Petitioner appeals an amended general judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. He argues that the amended judgment did not comply with ORS 138.640. We reverse and remand for entry of a judgment that conforms with the statute.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, petitioner was convicted of two counts of sex abuse in the second degree, ORS 163.425, and placed on probation. After his probation was revoked, he was sentenced to two consecutive 60-month terms. Petitioner appealed his convictions, and we affirmed. State v. Leahy, 183 Or App 377, 52 P3d 450 (2002).

After the judgment on his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whipple v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Owens v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zsarko v. AngelozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API