Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 2005No. 03-01-2577M; A123327PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Petitioner appeals a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief, ORS 138.510 to 138.680. On appeal, he raises issues based on statutory provisions that govern the contents of post-conviction relief judgments. Because petitioner did not preserve his arguments below, and because error is not apparent on the face of the record, ORAP 5.45, we affirm.

Petitioner was convicted of first-degree robbery. He subsequently petitioned for post-conviction relief, making numerous allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. After hearing evidence on the allegations in the petition,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bennett v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Whipple v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API