Meyers v. Maass
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Petitioner appeals from the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. The issue is whether, and when, a criminal defendant must be advised of the potential application of the dangerous offender statute. ORS 161.725.
Petitioner pled guilty to first degree assault. He was sentenced as a dangerous offender and began serving a minimum sentence of 15 years, with a maximum of 30 years. In his petition for post-conviction relief, he alleged that he had been denied adequate assistance of counsel, because his trial attorney had failed to inform him of the dangerous offender statute and its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stelts v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Hartzog v. KeeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Moen v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Moen v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Hedin v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hinton v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Whipple v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Fisher v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Hinton v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005