Legal Opinion
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Dixon
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 27, 2001No. AC 20322PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The defendant attorney, Samuel E. Dixon, Jr., appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court finding him in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct and imposing sanctions. This matter *509came to the trial court on a presentment by the plaintiff, the statewide grievance committee, alleging that the defendant had violated rules 1.15, 1.5 (c) and (e) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. After a hearing, the court dismissed the alleged violation of rule 1.15 for failure to prove the allegation by clear and convincing evidence,1 but found the defendant in violation of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Grievance Committee of the Hartford County Bar v. BroderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. ShlugerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. McClamConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re Melvin FinkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Daniels v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. HirschConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Zamarello v. RegesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.