Statewide Grievance Committee v. Shluger
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
The defendant, Robert J. Shluger, an attorney, appeals from the judgment of the trial court suspending him from the practice of law for a period of three years.1 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly: (1) considered certain criminal misconduct by the defendant not charged in the presentment; (2) considered prior ethical misconduct by the defendant for which he had been disciplined; and (3) concluded that the defendant’s federal felony conviction warranted his suspension from the practice of law for three years. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The facts are undisputed.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Massameno v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Notopoulos v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Thalheim v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Lewis v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.