Legal Opinion
State v. McClam
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 4, 1997No. 15604PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant, Gregory McClam, appeals1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to a three judge panel,2 of one count of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a.3 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) induced a state’s witness to invoke his fifth *200amendment privilege against self-incrimination regarding any questions about a pending related assault charge, (2) denied his motion for a judgment of acquittal on the charge of murder when the evidence at trial was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant possessed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. MarraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. MejiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. TomaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Jenkins v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. GuessConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- State v. DaeriaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Harold Cohn & Co. v. Harco International, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- DAP Financial Management Co. v. Mor-Fam Electric, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.