Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Statewide Grievance Committee

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 10, 2002No. AC 22215PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DRANGINIS, J.

The plaintiff, Douglas R. Daniels, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the reprimand issued to him by the defendant statewide grievance committee. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly held that his failure to pay in a timely manner the default judgment that had been rendered against him violated rule 8.4 (4)2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct3 and that *205his failure to answer the grievance complaint against him in connection therewith violated Practice Book § 2-32 (a) (l).4 We conclude that the court properly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grievance Committee v. RottnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  2. In re ZoarskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. In re FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Statewide Grievance Committee v. EgbarinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. LaSalle National Bank v. Freshfield Meadows, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. CondronConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Caldwell v. Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Henry v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Mississippi Bar v. DanielsMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  5. MacHado v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API