Legal Opinion
Grievance Committee of the Hartford County Bar v. Broder
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 11, 1930PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
Motion to erase from the docket is based upon the grounds that the grievance committee which is taking this appeal is not in any proper sense a party plaintiff and has not been and cannot be aggrieved by the judgment appealed from and has no right of appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court.
The practice pursued prior to the institution of a grievance committee in cases of alleged misconduct of an attorney was by complaint by a committee of the bar to the Superior Court. Fairfield County Bar v. Taylor, 60 Conn. 11, 22 Atl. 441.
On September 1st, 1890, the judges of the Superior Court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- O'brien's PetitionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Fairfield County Bar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
- Grievance Committee v. EnnisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
3Cited by35 opinions
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Massameno v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Heiberger v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- In re KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.