Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Knight, Vale & Gregory

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 13, 1977No. 2158-2PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrie, J.

The plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Orville W. Hunter, appeal from a summary judgment dismissing one of the several defendants named in their complaint—the accounting firm of Knight, Vale and Gregory. The trial court determined that as to this defendant, plaintiffs' claims of malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty were barred by the 3-year statute of limitations. We affirm the judgment.

The facts, as alleged in plaintiffs' complaint which was filed on March 19, 1975, may be summarized as follows:

Orville W. Hunter was the president and principal stockholder of W. H. Opie and Company until March 20,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gazija v. Nicholas Jerns Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Rikstad v. HolmbergWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Peters v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Moonie v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Freeman v. NavarreWashington Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Sparling v. Hoffman Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Ohler v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Hibbard v. Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca & O'HernWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Crisman v. CrismanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Crisman v. CrismanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API