Legal Opinion

Rikstad v. Holmberg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1969No. 39428PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Plaintiff, for her benefit and for the benefit of four surviving children of her deceased husband, brings this action for damages for the alleged wrongful death of her husband. Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing her 'action with prejudice entered after the trial court had sustained a challenge to the sufficiency of plaintiff’s evidence.

At the outset, we are aware of the oft-quoted rule that a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence at the end of plaintiff’s case admits the truth of the evidence and all the inferences that can reasonably be drawn therefrom. It requires that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Berglund v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. O'DONOGHUE v. RiggsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Mason v. Bon Marche Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Fleming v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Pedroza v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Busta Ex Rel. Busta v. Columbus Hospital Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Christen v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1989

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API