Legal Opinion
Crisman v. Crisman
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 14, 1997No. 18902-0-IIPublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
931 P.2d 163 (1997)
85 Wash.App. 15
Valerie L. CRISMAN, a U.S. Citizen, Appellant,
v.
Robert E. CRISMAN, Richard Uhlich, Respondents,
The Gallery of Diamonds, Inc., and John and Jane Does A through Z, Defendants.
No. 18902-0-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
January 3, 1997.
Publication Ordered and Amended on Denial of Reconsideration February 14, 1997.
Robert W. Huffhines, Jr., Kelso, for Appellant.
David Charles Nordeen, Weber & Gunn, Vancouver, for Respondents.
SEINFELD, Chief Judge.
Valerie Crisman contends that the trial court erred in relying upon the statute of limitations to dismiss…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Allen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Gazija v. Nicholas Jerns Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Mayer v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Mayer v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Winbun v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Winbun v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2001
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.