Legal Opinion

National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Saffold

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 10, 1932No. 3 Div. 20PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Our attention, on this appeal, is directed first to the motion for a new trial and the ruling of the court on it.

We have carefully considered the evidence. In many respects it is in sharp conflict, presenting a question for the jury. It is not primarily a question with us of the credibility of the witnesses, unless it is apparent that due consideration was not given to their testimony in the trial court. There was abundant evidence that Mary Sloan, or Hartley, applied for the insurance while in good health, and kept up payment of the premiums until her death. True, there was evidence to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American-Traders' Nat. Bank v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Alabama Clay Products Co. v. MathewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Independent Life Ins. Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Milbra v. Sloss-S. S. & I. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Martin v. HemphillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Adoption of LongSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Greene v. Hanover Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Birmingham Electric Co. v. LinnAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Kirk v. BonnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Alexander v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API