Alabama Clay Products Co. v. Mathews
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
Section 8662, new to the Code of 1923, says: “In civil and criminal eases, either party shall have the right to examine jurors as to their qualifications, interest, or bias that would affect the trial of the case, and shall have the right, under the direction of the court, to examine said jurors as to any matter that might tend to affect their verdict.”
This section was not intended as affording a ground of challenge for cause, but to enable counsel to obtain information in order to intelligently strike the jurors. It is evident, however, that the nature and character of questions to be asked…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rose v. MagroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Thompson v. Alexander City Cotton Mills Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Ferrell v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Milbra v. Sloss-S. S. & I. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Allen v. Standard Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Roan v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1970
- Jordan v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- McPhearson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.