Legal Opinion

Independent Life Ins. Co. v. Seale

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 11, 1929No. 6 Div. 323PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoster, J.

A clause in a life insurance policy to the effect that no obligation is assumed by the insurer unless, on the date of the delivery of the policy, insured is alive and in sound health, has frequently been held by this court to be in legal effect a warranty, within the terms of section 8364 of the Code. Reliance Life Ins. Co. v. Sneed, 218 Ala. 669, 117 So. 307; Cotton States Life Ins. Co. v. Crozier, 216 Ala. 537, 113 So. 615; So. Life & Health Ins. Co. v. Morgan, 216 Ala. 529, 113 So. 540; Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Mandelbaum, 207 Ala. 234, 92 So. 440, 29 A. L. R. 649. And if the unsound health…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. MandelbaumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Reliance Life Ins. Co. v. SneedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. RigginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Cotton States Life Ins. Co. v. CrozierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. NewellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. MannAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Independent Life Ins. Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API