Legal Opinion
Martin v. Hemphill
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided February 15, 1922No. 274-3506PublishedCited by 24 opinions
Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Third Supreme Judicial District. Action by T. W. Martin against C. W. Hemphill. From a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals ’affirming a judgment of the district court for defendant (221 S. W. 333), plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtPowedu, J.
The Court of Civil Appeals gives us the benefit of a clear and accurate statement of this case, as follows:
“Appellant filed this suit against the appel-lees, C. W. Hemphill and the Central State Bank of Coleman, a state banking corporation, to recover damages for the breach of certain contracts for the sale of cotton by appellees to appellant. The appellees filed separate answers, and the trial court sustained exceptions of the appellee Central State Bank, which eliminated that defendant from the suit.
“The case was tried before a jury, and the court peremptorily instructed a verdict in favor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heffron v. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Coverdill v. SeymourTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Tinsley v. DowellTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Glasscock v. PriceTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Harper v. Lott Town & Improvement Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Howell v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- McFaddin, Wiess & Kyle Land Co. v. Texas Rice Land Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Lachmann v. Houston Chronicle Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Cavaness v. General CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Kent v. National Supply Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.