Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1940No. Docket No. 89, Calendar No. 40,705PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Denial of the motions to dismiss should be affirmed.

The declaration states a cause of action. The declaration is not artistic and may need some amendment but, as drawn, states sufficient to call upon defendants to join in framing issues of fact for trial. The action is upon promises, based on contract, with a third party as beneficiary, and the allegation that money, due and payable to plaintiff, has been paid by joint action of defendants to another without right thereto. This right of action is not dependent upon reformation of the policy in a court of equity.

As stated in 5 Joyce on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance v. BellIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. SaffoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Lenning v. Retail Merchants Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corp. v. HardwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Sewell v. Detroit Electrical Contractors Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ester v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API