Legal Opinion
Robes v. Town of Hartford
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 10, 1993No. 92-098PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Plaintiffs, developers of new residential buildings in the Town of Hartford, appeal from the order of the superior court, which held that 24 V.S.A. § 3615, as that statute read in 1986, authorized the Town of Hartford to impose an impact fee on new developments to finance future expansion of the Town’s sewage capacity. Defendants appeal the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to plaintiffs. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The Town of Hartford operates a municipal sewage system to which all residential buildings are required to be connected. On December 29, 1986, the Town’s Board of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Arthur Ray PARHAM, Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- State v. WelchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Residents Ad Hoc Stadium Committee v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Dover Historical Society, Inc. v. City of Dover Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Sagar v. Warren SelectboardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Lemieux v. Tri-State Lotto CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Dept. of Corrections v. Human Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- In re Jon Porter, M.D.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.