Legal Opinion

Parks v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF TILLAMOOK CTY.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 18, 1972PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

Petitioners seek writ of mandamus requiring the Board of County Commissioners for Tillamook County to cancel building permits issued for the construction of 11 houses on Block 24, Neskowin, Oregon, and to compel the removal of those houses. Petitioners, owners of land adjoining Block 24, contended that the houses on Block 24 are being constructed in violation of the Tillamook County Zoning Ordinance.

After issuance of an alternative writ addressed to the county commissioners, Spliid Investment Co., the developer constructing the houses in question, filed a motion to intervene, which was…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ricco v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Corsino v. GroverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. Stroh v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Brady v. Board of Appeals of WestportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. State Ex Rel. Maizels v. JubaOregon Supreme Court · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Stephen T. Burns v. City of Des PeresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  3. Minor v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Drumheller v. Shelburne Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Evans v. BurrussCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API