Legal Opinion

Blundon v. Town of Stamford

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 27, 1990No. 89-108PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Defendants, Town of Stamford (town) and Town of Stamford Zoning Board of Adjustment (board), appeal the decision of the superior court reversing the board’s decision that denied plaintiff, Robert Blundon, a conditional use permit. We reverse and reinstate the board’s decision.

The facts were stipulated by the parties as follows. Plaintiff owns a 206 acre lot in Stamford, Vermont. Under the town’s zoning ordinance, the property is located in the forest district. The only access to plaintiff’s lot is through an easement of at least twenty feet in width over a right-of-way known as Coal Kiln…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kalakowski v. John A. Russell Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  2. Hinsdale v. Village of Essex JunctionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. City of Rutland v. KeifferSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  4. State v. KrethSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Wolfe v. YudichakSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Vermont National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. In Re DunnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  3. Drumheller v. Shelburne Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Slocum v. Department of Social WelfareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API