Legal Opinion

Allustiarte v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 16, 2001No. 00-5112PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims that dismissed appellants’ complaint against the United States for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Allustiarte v. United States, 46 Fed.Cl. 713 (2000). The court determined that it did not have jurisdiction to consider appellants’ allegations “that the actions approved by the bankruptcy courts [of the Ninth Circuit] resulted in takings ... in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” Id. at 716. Because the Court of Federal Claims does not have jurisdiction to review…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on MotionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Vereda, Ltda. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Edelmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Allustiarte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Stanwyck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API