Allustiarte v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims that dismissed appellants’ complaint against the United States for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Allustiarte v. United States, 46 Fed.Cl. 713 (2000). The court determined that it did not have jurisdiction to consider appellants’ allegations “that the actions approved by the bankruptcy courts [of the Ninth Circuit] resulted in takings ... in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” Id. at 716. Because the Court of Federal Claims does not have jurisdiction to review…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on MotionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Vereda, Ltda. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Edelmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Allustiarte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Stanwyck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.