Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 15, 2010No. 10-662CPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HORN, Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The plaintiff, Michael A. Hernandez, filed a pro se complaint in this court on October 1, 2010, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Based on the information submitted with the complaint and in forma pauperis application, Mr. Hernandez qualifies for in forma pauperis status. Subsequently, on October 28, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel. How*198ever, because the court dismisses plaintiff’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, the court finds plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel to be…

2Cases cited89 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sykes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Kenyon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Ajamian v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API