Hernandez v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HORN, Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The plaintiff, Michael A. Hernandez, filed a pro se complaint in this court on October 1, 2010, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Based on the information submitted with the complaint and in forma pauperis application, Mr. Hernandez qualifies for in forma pauperis status. Subsequently, on October 28, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel. How*198ever, because the court dismisses plaintiff’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, the court finds plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel to be…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sykes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Kenyon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Ajamian v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.