Legal Opinion
Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on Motion
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 18, 1994No. 93-5170PublishedCited by 499 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
This matter brings before us the question of the appropriate standard for summary disposition of an appeal, when there has not yet been full briefing of the merits, and no oral argument has been held or allowed. We must then apply that standard to the circumstances of the case before us.
The United States moves for summary affirmance of the Court of Federal Claims’ June 3, 1993 order dismissing Roynell Joshua’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Joshua argues that the United States’ motion is improper and requests that sanctions be imposed.
BACKGROUND
Joshua filed a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Chemical Engineering Corp., and John O. McLean v. Marlo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Mayland L. Clark v. Albert GulesianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Robert S. Goldstein v. The Riggs National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- James Merritt and Sons v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by499 opinions
- Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Fiebelkorn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Vereda, Ltda. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- McCullough v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Lengen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
494 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.