Celotex Corp. v. Edwards
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that respondents should be allowed to execute against petitioner’s surety on a supersedeas bond posted by petitioner where the judgment which occasioned the bond had become final. It so held even though the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida previously had issued an injunction prohibiting respondents *302from executing on the bond without the Bankruptcy Court’s permission. We hold that respondents were obligated to obey the injunction issued by the Bankruptcy Court.
I
In 1987 respondents Bennie and Joann…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,091 opinions
- Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Robert Gruntz, Debtor. Robert Gruntz v. Opinion County of Los Angeles Los Angeles District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re the Celotex Corporation, Debtor. Owens-Illinois, Incorporated v. Rapid American Corporation, Successor in Interest to Philip-Carey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- In Re: Combustion Engineering, Inc. First State Insurance Company Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
1,086 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.