State v. Roberts
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Justice.
Since defendant pled guilty his appeal presents for review only the question whether error appears on the face of the record proper. State v. Higgs, 270 N.C. 111, 153 S.E. 2d 781; State v. Newell, 268 N.C. 300, 150 S.E. 2d 405. Suffice it to say, no error appears. The bill of indictment is in all respects regular ; defendant’s plea was understandingly and voluntarily made; and the sentence imposed is within the statutory limits. See State v. Dawson, 268 N.C. 603, 151 S.E. 2d 203; State v. Darnell, 266 N.C. 640, 146 S.E. 2d 800.
This case is just one more example of the manner in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. DarnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. HiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. NewellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. McClureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. WyattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.