Legal Opinion

State v. Russell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 1972No. 48PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

In the Court of Appeals defendant admitted that he could find no error in the record of the trial, but requested that the verdicts and sentence imposed be set aside and a new trial granted.

The record contains no exception or assignment of error; however, defendant’s appeal presents the question whether error appears on the face of the record proper. State v. Ford, 281 N.C. 62, 187 S.E. 2d 741 (1972); State v. Roberts, 279 N.C. 500, 183 S.E. 2d 647 (1971). “Ordinarily, in criminal cases the record proper consists of (1) the organization of the court, (2) the charge (information,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Blitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Burroughs and Cannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. CokerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. SquireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API