Legal Opinion

State v. McClure

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 23, 1972No. 7218SC146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Since defendant pleaded guilty, this appeal presents for review only the question whether error appears on the face of the record proper. State v. Roberts, 279 N.C. 500, 183 S.E. 2d 647. None does, and defendant’s counsel so concedes.

The brief of the Attorney General points out that the first count in the bill of indictment in Case No. 71CR38916, which charged the offense of felonious larceny, was defective in that it failed to allege the name of the owner of the property stolen, citing State v. McKoy, 265 N.C. 380, 144 S.E. 2d 46. This defect, however, is immaterial, since…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. McKoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. TruesdaleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. SnipesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API