Myers v. City of Oakdale
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WAHL, Justice.
We are called upon in this case to answer two questions involving the Veterans Preference Act, Minn.Stat. § 197.46 (1986). First, whether an employee-veteran who has been placed on indefinite medical leave of absence has been removed, as that word is used in the Act, from his or her position or employment. Second, whether an employee-veteran who may be physically unable to perform the job is entitled to a veterans preference hearing prior to being removed from the position or employment. The court of appeals held that because the effect of appellant City of Oakdale’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Horosko v. Mt. Pl't Twp. S. DistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- State ex rel. Boyd v. MatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Leininger v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Tafoya v. New Mexico State Police BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Young v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- William Andreu v. Glen E. Sapp, Individually and as Sheriff of Charlotte County, and William E. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Larry M. Young v. Township of Green OakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Gorecki v. Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Harr v. City of EdinaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Johnson v. County of AnokaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.