Legal Opinion
Harr v. City of Edina
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 9, 1996No. C7-95-1277PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision by an administrative law judge and affirmed by the Commissioner of Veterans Affairs. The City of Edina (the City) argues that the suspension of Lloyd Harr was not in violation of the Veterans Preference Act (VPA) and he is therefore not entitled to back wages. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Lloyd Harr served in the U.S. Marine Corps from May 1971 to April 1972, when he was honorably discharged from active duty. From 1985 to July 2, 1990, Harr was employed by the City’s Parks Maintenance Department as a light equipment operator. His…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Johnson v. Village of CohassetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Fetsch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Myers v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Sprague v. HeiseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jackel v. BrowerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Lakehead Pipe Line Co. v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Jackel v. BrowerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Peter K Butler v. Shari MooreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Wagner v. MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLSCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998