Young v. City of Duluth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
The City of Duluth seeks further review of a Minnesota Court of Appeals decision holding that Howard Young, a veteran dismissed from his employment with the city without written notice of his rights under the Veterans Preference Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 197.46-481 (1984), was entitled to a writ of mandamus commanding the city to reinstate him to his former position of employment and to award him back pay and benefits from the date of his termination. The trial court had denied issuance of the writ, ruling that the city’s failure to notify Young of his right to a hearing under the Act…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Boyd v. MatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Tamminen v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Niemi v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Caffrey v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Evens v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Myers v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Henry v. Metropolitan Waste Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Pawelk v. Camden TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Gorecki v. Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Johnson v. County of AnokaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.