Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Boyd v. Matson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 1923No. 23,422PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tayjoor, C.

Prior to October 23, 1922, the city of St. Paul employed 16 operators in its police and fire alarm telegraph bureau, but on that date reduced the number of such operators from 16 to 11. In consequence of this reduction in number, 5 of the former operators were discharged, and the relator was one of the 5 so discharged. Appointments to these positions and removals therefrom are regulated and governed by civil service rules established by and pursuant to the city charter. These rules provide:

“Whenever it becomes necessary in any bureau, for lack of work or funds or for other causes,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Quintin v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Breckenridge v. ScannellNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. State ex rel. Mortensen v. CopelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. State ex rel. Cowden v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. State ex rel. Nelson v. Board of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McGinnis v. Police Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Smith v. Flint City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Freiberg v. Board of Education of Big Bay De Noc School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Meehan v. EmpieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Swantush v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API