Legal Opinion
Johnson v. County of Anoka
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 22, 1995No. CX-95-625PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
By writ of certiorari, relator Lucius Johnson challenges the decision of the Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs awarding him damages, arguing that (1) the award is insufficient, (2) the county failed to prove lack of mitigation of damages, and (3) he is entitled to reinstatement. Anoka County filed a notice of review, arguing that Johnson is not entitled to veterans preference rights or, in the alternative, that Johnson’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations or laches. We reverse.
FACTS
Relator Lucius Johnson is an honorably discharged veteran. Johnson…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Myers v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Young v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brula v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Brula v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Tharalson v. Hennepin ParksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996