Legal Opinion
Chrysal USA, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 18, 2012No. Slip Op. 12-96; Court 11-00092PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIDGWAY, Judge:
In this action, plaintiff Chrysal USA, Inc. (“Chrysal”) seeks to challenge the tariff classification of “flower food” which was among the various products included in 17 entries of merchandise that Chrysal imported into the United States in 2008. See generally Complaint. Chrysal invokes 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a), which vests the U.S. Court of International Trade with exclusive jurisdiction over “any civil action commenced to contest the denial of a protest.” See id. ¶ 1; 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (2006); 1 see also Plaintiffs Memorandum in Support of Its Opposition to Defendant’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Saab Cars Usa, Inc. v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Netchem, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Ovan International, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Puerto Rico Towing & Barge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- The Jankovich Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015