Netchem, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Senior Judge:
This suit challenges Customs and Border Protection’s decision to apply a 3.7% ad valorem tariff rate to plaintiff Netehem, Inc.’s lanthanum oxide imports. In its complaint, Netehem invoked the court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (2006). Defendant the United States (the “Government”) now moves to dismiss the lawsuit for lack of jurisdiction under US-CIT Rule 12(b)(1).
“Jurisdiction is ... the authority-conferred by Congress to decide a given type of case one way or the other.” Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 538, 94 S.Ct. 1372, 39 L.Ed.2d 577 (1974).…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017