Legal Opinion

Netchem, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 14, 2014No. Slip Op. 14-16; Court 12-00123PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOLDBERG, Senior Judge:

This suit challenges Customs and Border Protection’s decision to apply a 3.7% ad valorem tariff rate to plaintiff Netehem, Inc.’s lanthanum oxide imports. In its complaint, Netehem invoked the court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (2006). Defendant the United States (the “Government”) now moves to dismiss the lawsuit for lack of jurisdiction under US-CIT Rule 12(b)(1).

“Jurisdiction is ... the authority-conferred by Congress to decide a given type of case one way or the other.” Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 538, 94 S.Ct. 1372, 39 L.Ed.2d 577 (1974).…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API