People v. Lucas
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Defendants appeal from a condemnation action judgment in their favor in the sum of $226,000.
Questions Presented
1. Was the value of “trade fixtures” included in the judgment?
2. Alleged restriction of cross-examination.
The property condemned is % acre at Walnut Creek. The main improvements consist of two buildings, serving as automobile agency salesrooms and repair shops and a gasoline station. The balance of the property served as a used car lot and storage space. Affixed in and out of the buildings were certain special in place improvements used in connection with the businesses on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- United States v. Certain Lands in Town of HighlandsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
3Cited by8 opinions
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. BoehmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Estate of PieperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. NahabedianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LagissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.