Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1936No. Civ. No. 10402PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAAS, J., pro tem.

This is an action for the condemnation of certain properties in the city of Los Angeles to be utilized in the construction of a union passenger depot in said city.

*509Appellants’ opening brief charges irregularities and misconduct of respondents’ counsel, setting up that by such irregularities and misconduct before the jury, respondents prejudiced the jury in their favor to the detriment of appellants and resulting in a miscarriage of justice. The record reveals the following took place in the presence and hearing of the jury panel:

“Mr. Morgan: I’ll say this for us, and I think…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Cent. Pac. R.R. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API