Legal Opinion
United States v. Certain Lands in Town of Highlands
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 7, 1942PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the United States of America, moves for an order confirming and adopting the report of commissioners of appraisal heretofore appointed in this condemnation proceeding. The lands involved are sought by plaintiff as part of its program of expansion of the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York. See United States v. Certain Lands in Town of Highlands, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1941, 36 F.Supp. 968; Id., D.C.1941, 36 F.Supp. 971; Id., D.C.1942, 45 F.Supp. 126.
The commissioners qualified, viewed the property, held extensive hearings and have filed their…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- New York Central Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- South Buffalo Railway Co. v. KirkoverNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Cherry Creek National Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Bagully v. Morning Journal Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Congressional School of Aeronautics, Inc. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Reservation Eleven Associates, a Limited Partnership v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- People v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957