Legal Opinion
People v. Boehm
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 21, 1969No. Crim. 6837PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.
Defendant Eugene Boehm was convicted after a jury trial of the crime of conspiracy to bring narcotics into a county jail.
His first assignment of error relates to what he calls “the final bit of testimony before the jury, that appellant had been convicted of so-called ‘ felony child beating. ’ ’ ’
Boehm took the stand and testified on his own behalf after which he was cross-examined by the district attorney. The prosecution then put on rebuttal witnesses, whereupon the court recessed for the day. At the next session of the court additional prosecution rebuttal witnesses testified. The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. KempleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- In Re DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- In the Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings. Frank J. Duffy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Shepherd v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Rodriguez v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- State v. LowerySupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.