Hacienda Mexican Restaurant of Kalamazoo Corp. v. Hacienda Franchise Group, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHEZEM, Judge.
Case Summary
Defendants-Appellants, Hacienda Mexican Restaurant of Kalamazoo Corp., Albert Mick-elson, and Seott Borsodi ("Franchisees") appeal the judgment in favor of Hacienda Franchise Group, Inc. ("Franchisor"). We affirm.
Issues
Franchisees present seven issues for review, consolidated and restated as:
I. Whether the trial court properly required proof of scienter upon Franchisees' counter-claim for franchise fraud.
II. Whether the trial court should have imposed personal liability against the principals of Franchisor.
III. Whether Franchisees motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daub v. DaubIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. MagnusonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Willie's Const. Co., Inc. v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Enservco, Inc. v. Indiana Securities DivisionIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Weisman v. Hopf-Himsel, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Keith v. MendusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Marriage of Pond v. PondIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Cook v. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- National Ass'n of Miniature Enthusiasts v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.