Legal Opinion

Hacienda Mexican Restaurant of Kalamazoo Corp. v. Hacienda Franchise Group, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1994No. 71A04-9402-CV-37PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary

Defendants-Appellants, Hacienda Mexican Restaurant of Kalamazoo Corp., Albert Mick-elson, and Seott Borsodi ("Franchisees") appeal the judgment in favor of Hacienda Franchise Group, Inc. ("Franchisor"). We affirm.

Issues

Franchisees present seven issues for review, consolidated and restated as:

I. Whether the trial court properly required proof of scienter upon Franchisees' counter-claim for franchise fraud.

II. Whether the trial court should have imposed personal liability against the principals of Franchisor.

III. Whether Franchisees motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Daub v. DaubIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. State v. MagnusonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Willie's Const. Co., Inc. v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Enservco, Inc. v. Indiana Securities DivisionIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Weisman v. Hopf-Himsel, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Keith v. MendusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Marriage of Pond v. PondIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Cook v. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. National Ass'n of Miniature Enthusiasts v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API