Legal Opinion

Walker v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1996No. 49S00-9404-CR-337PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Appellant Aaron Walker contends that to sustain a conviction for dealing in cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school, as a class A felony, Ind.Code Ann. § 85-48-4-1 (West Supp.1995), the State must prove that the defendant had actual knowledge that the sale was occurring within 1,000 feet of a school. We hold that the Code creates a strict Hability enhancement and that such proof is unnee-essary.

The State charged Walker with dealing in cocaine after he sold the drug to an undercover police officer, Ernie Witten. Armed with a $20 bill to make a purchase and a microphone…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. KeihnIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Snider v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Van Sant v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Enservco, Inc. v. Indiana Securities DivisionIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ellis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Walker Whatley v. Dushan ZateckyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Schaaf v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Prewitt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API