Legal Opinion

Keith v. Mendus

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1996No. 45A05-9409-CV-357PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RUCKER, Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Scott N. Keith (Doctor Keith) was terminated from his employment with Our Lady of Mercy Hospital and thereafter sued Defendants-Appellees Mary Men-dus, Mark Rybczynski and Richard Krejsa (collectively referred to as Physicians) claiming tortious interference with a contractual relationship. Following a jury award of damages in Doctor Keith’s favor, Physicians filed a motion to correct errors. The trial court granted the motion in part and ordered a new trial limited to the issue of damages. Doctor Keith now appeals claiming the trial court erred in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Winkler v. V.G. Reed & Sons, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Anthony P. Locricchio, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Legal Services Corp., Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Martin v. PlattIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Williams v. SeniffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Kahala Royal Corp. v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & StifelHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ajabu v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Salcedo v. ToeppIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API