Legal Opinion
Weisman v. Hopf-Himsel, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 20, 1989No. 63A01-8807-CV-00228PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
RATLIFFE, Chief Judge.
Fred Weisman, his sons Mark and Dennis Weisman, and Weisman Farms appeal ed the judgment of the trial court finding them jointly and severally liable to Hopf-Himsel, Inc. for $13,582.00 in tractor repair and rental costs. On review this court held that plaintiff's exhibits one and two constituted hearsay evidence and, therefore, were inadmissible. Weisman v. Hopf-Himsel, Inc. (1989), Ind.App., 532 N.E.2d 29, 32. We rejected Hopf-Himsel's argument that both exhibits should be admitted under the business records exception to the hearsay rule. Id.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Moore-Mansfield Construction Co v. Indianapolis, Newcastle & Toledo Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Indiana Industries, Inc. v. Wedge Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- American United Life Insurance Company v. PeffleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Urbanational Developers, Inc. v. Shamrock Engineering, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Dunn v. CadienteIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Songer v. Civitas BankIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Mechanics Laundry & Supply, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1995
- Haas Carriage, Inc. v. BernaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Roy A. Miller & Sons, Inc. v. Industrial Hardwoods Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Brant v. HesterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.