Legal Opinion
Stewart-Brownstein v. Casey
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 27, 1999No. AC 18036PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiff, Linda Stewart-Brownstein, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The sole issue before this court is whether the plaintiffs failure to comply with General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 52-45a1 or Practice Book § 8-12 deprived the trial court *86of subject matter jurisdiction, which may not be waived, or of personal jurisdiction, which may be waived.
The pro se plaintiff, who is not an attorney, filed an action in Superior Court against the defendants, Concetta Casey, Clarence Casey and Phillips Home…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Hillman v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Commissioner of Environmental Protection v. Connecticut Building Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Brunswick v. Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Connor v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Raynor v. Hickock Realty Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Raudat v. LearyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- In re M.T.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. BurtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.