Legal Opinion
Raynor v. Hickock Realty Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 26, 2000No. AC 19578PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The plaintiff, Alice Raynor, appeals from the trial court’s judgment rendered upon the granting of the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, Hickock Realty Corporation, because the plaintiff *235did not commence her personal injury action before the applicable statute of limitations expired. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that (1) she failed to commence her action within the time permitted by the applicable statute of limitations and (2) the statute of limitations was not tolled when the defendant was served with prejudgment…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- John H. Kolb & Sons, Inc. v. G & L Excavating, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. DunicanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Davies v. General Tours, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Gillum v. Yale UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Feldmann v. SebastianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.