Legal Opinion

Byard v. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1963No. Civ. 27228PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

National Automobile and Casualty Insurance Company appeals from the judgment entered against it following a non jury trial of an action brought by respondents upon an undertaking on attachment filed pursuant to section 539 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

In the prior action in which appellant’s undertaking was filed, respondents’ real property was attached and their motion to quash the attachment was denied. Thereafter a trial on the merits was concluded by a judgment in respondents’ favor. They were awarded their costs, which were paid. Subsequently they filed the instant action against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Eisenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Reachi v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Barlin v. BarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Clark v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arcturus Manufacturing Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Systems Investment Corp. v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Mart, Inc. v. National Automobile & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Stiner v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. White v. Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API