Legal Opinion

Mart, Inc. v. National Automobile & Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1967No. Civ. 31222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

National Automobile and Casualty Company (hereinafter sometimes referred to as National) appeals from a judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of Mart, Inc. (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Mart) in an action for damages on an attachment bond.

Mart is a closely held corporation which operates a discount appliance store under the supervision of its principal officer and stockholder, Murray Mellman (hereinafter referred to as Mellman). Bernard Elowitz, who worked in the Mart store, initially sued Mart and Mellman for an accounting of his share of the profits realized by the business…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Reachi v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State Ex Rel. State Public Works Board v. Westover Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. LeFave v. DimondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trout v. CarlesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. On v. Cow Hollow PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Universal Trading & Investment v. Petro KiritchenkoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API