Clark v. Andrews
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment that they take nothing entered after a demurrer to their amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.
By the first cause of action plaintiffs seek damages for wrongful attachment against defendant collection agency, its assignor, Kathleen M. Ritchie, and defendant casualty eom pany as surety on the undertaking on attachment filed by the collection agency. By the second cause of action punitive damages are sought against defendant collection agency and its assignor on the ground that the attachment was levied with malice and without probable…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gudger v. MantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Reachi v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Kinsey v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Cohn v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Heath v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Palmer v. Ted Stevens Honda, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Gwynn v. WilhelmOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Cámara Insular de Comerciantes Mayoristas v. AnadónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- Bay County Bar Ass'n v. Finance System, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Byard v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.