Legal Opinion
White v. Indemnity Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 4, 1966No. Civ. 22501PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
Plaintiffs had judgments upon an undertaking on attachment. Defendant surety appeals.
In the earlier action in which the attachment issued, the complaint, filed by two plaintiffs, named as defendants “Wilson Dills, Black and White Company, a co-partnership, First Doe, Second Doe and Third Doe.” It alleged that the then plaintiffs did not know the true names of the three Does, but asked leave to insert them when discovered. The undertaking on attachment filed by appellant was captioned “Bauer-Lesser, a partnership, et al., Plaintiff, v. Wilson Dills, et al., Defendant.” In it, the surety…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reachi v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- State Ex Rel. State Public Works Board v. Westover Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. HouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Bunn v. Lucas, Pino & LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Schneider v. ZoellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Residents of Beverly Glen, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Winick Corp. v. County Sanitation District No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Mart, Inc. v. National Automobile & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967