Legal Opinion

State v. Sample

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 11, 2020No. 54/19PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Hayes Sample, No. 54, September Term, 2019 MARYLAND RULE 5-901(a) AND (b)(4) – AUTHENTICATING SOCIAL MEDIA EVIDENCE THROUGH CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE – “REASONABLE JUROR” TEST – Court of Appeals held that trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting Facebook-related evidence, as there was sufficient circumstantial evidence under Maryland Rule 5-901(b)(4) for reasonable juror to find that Facebook profiles belonged to defendant, Hayes Sample, and to defendant’s alleged accomplice, Claude Mayo, and to find that defendant unfriended accomplice on Facebook day after…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. GagliardiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. VaynerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. PurdyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  5. Pete v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Irwin Industrial Tool v. PiferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Mooney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  3. State v. McDonnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  4. Irwin Industrial Tool v. PiferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Pifer v. Irwin Industrial ToolCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API