Legal Opinion

Irwin Industrial Tool v. Pifer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 31, 2022No. 49/21Published

1Opinion of the Court

Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. Christine Pifer, et al., No. 49, September Term, 2021 AUTHENTICATION THROUGH CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE UNDER MARYLAND RULE 5-901(b)(4) – “REASONABLE JUROR” TEST – ALTERNATIVE GROUNDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT – Court of Appeals held that items purchased on eBay that purportedly contained defendant’s product contaminated with asbestos were authenticated as exemplars of product, as there was sufficient circumstantial evidence for reasonable juror to find by preponderance of evidence that substance within containers was defendant’s product. Court of Appeals concluded…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Phipps v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. BalbosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Piscatelli v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Dehn v. EdgecombeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. United States v. VaynerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API