State v. McDonnell
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
State of Maryland v. Daniel Ashley McDonnell, No. 36, September Term, 2022 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – FOURTH AMENDMENT – SEARCHES AND SEIZURES – REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY – CONSENT – FORENSIC COPY OF DIGITAL DATA – Supreme Court of Maryland held that defendant had reasonable expectation of privacy in data stored on his laptop’s hard drive, whether data was electronically stored on his hard drive or government’s copy of hard drive made with defendant’s consent. Defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy was not eliminated by government’s copying of hard drive because no data was exposed…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Freddy Portillo-Osorto v. Rachel Leslie DanielDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- Shuler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2026